Corporate Power — Breaking Up Monopolies, Rebuilding Competition
Competition requires rules. When corporations write them, the market is neither free nor competitive. We restore the rules.
The two-minute version.
Market captured by monopolies. Antitrust enforcement asleep for a generation. Hospital mergers raise prices 6–65%. Four meatpackers control 85% of beef.
Break up proven monopolies. Pass an American Digital Markets Act. Restore Glass-Steagall. Ban non-competes. Build public broadband.
Lower prices. More jobs. Higher wages. 30–60 million workers freed from non-competes. Broadband reaches 42 million Americans.
Corporate concentration has reached historic levels. Four meatpackers control 85% of US beef slaughter. Three PBMs process ~80% of all prescriptions. 97% of metro health insurance markets are 'highly concentrated.' The Big Four airlines control 74% of US seat capacity. The US bank count collapsed 72% since 1984 — from 14,496 to 4,027. JPMorgan Chase alone now holds $3.64 trillion in assets.
Federal antitrust enforcement has become structural theater. In August 2024, a federal judge declared Google a monopolist in search. In April 2025, a second ruling found Google illegally monopolized ad tech. Yet despite two judicial monopoly findings, the enforcement pathway remains broken: consent decrees expire, behavioral remedies reverse, and structural remedies — divestitures and breakups — remain the exception, not the default for proven monopolists.
The 'kill zone' effect drops venture capital investment 6× in markets after major tech acquisitions, directly suppressing startup formation. Hospital mergers produce 6–65% price increases with no documented quality improvement. Corporate markups surged from 18% above cost in 1980 to 67% above cost by 2016. Concentration is not efficient — it is efficient at extracting rents.
The CEO-to-worker pay ratio went from 21:1 in 1965 to 281:1 in 2024. S&P 500 stock buybacks hit a record $942.5 billion in 2024 — capital that could have funded wages, R&D, or investment, instead returned to shareholders. Business dynamism, startup formation, and local journalism have all declined in direct proportion to rising concentration.
How the US compares.
What Americans face vs. what peer nations achieve.
| Measure | US | Peer Nation |
|---|---|---|
| Antitrust enforcement model | Consent decrees | Structural remedies(🇪🇺 EU default) |
| Tech platform regulation | Reactive litigation | Ex ante gatekeeper rules(🇪🇺 EU DMA) |
| Enforcement timeline | Indefinite | 30 days / 180 days(CGP Mandatory Duty) |
| Corporate markups above cost | 67% | 18%(1980 baseline) |
"This is not anti-business. It is anti-extraction. A free market requires competition, and competition requires rules. When corporations write the rules — through lobbying, the revolving door, and captured regulators — the market is neither free nor competitive. We restore the rules."
— The Common Good Party — Corporate Power Policy
What the CGP plan actually does
For workers, non-competes currently restrict 30–60 million Americans from changing jobs or starting competing businesses. The FTC projects a federal ban would generate $488 billion in wage gains over a decade, create 8,500+ new businesses annually, and increase patenting activity by 14%+. Codetermination at 2,000+ employee firms gives workers half the supervisory board seats. The CEO pay deduction cap (50:1 CEO-to-median ratio) stops the public subsidy for extreme inequality.
For consumers, hospital merger prices drop by 6–65% without quality loss. The algorithmic price-fixing ban on rent, healthcare, and airline fares brings prices closer to competitive levels. Antitrust structural remedies prevent the next generation of anticompetitive acquisitions. Broadband reaches 42 million Americans currently stuck with one provider; the $50B fund prioritizes municipal and cooperative networks, delivering the 4.42:1 ROI Chattanooga proved possible.
For small businesses and entrepreneurs, the 'kill zone' effect disappears when killer acquisitions are presumptively blocked. Merger presumptions in concentrated markets stop big companies from acquiring nascent competitors before they scale. Farm consolidation stops; seed market concentration is capped at 25%; the Big Four meatpackers are broken up. Independent farmers and small tech companies can compete again.
For innovation, codetermination does not suppress innovation — German manufacturers competing globally prove it. VC investment no longer funnels through acquisition-for-kill channels; capital flows to companies scaling competitive products, not acquisition targets being eliminated. Patent creation increases 14%+ post-non-compete ban. Competition drives innovation; monopoly drives rent extraction.
What changes on day one
"Germany's codetermination model — workers elect half the supervisory board — has been running for decades at firms that are globally competitive manufacturers and exporters. Shared governance is not anti-business. It is pro-worker and pro-productivity."
— CGP Corporate Power Paper — §What Other Countries Do
See where every side actually stands.
Current federal law, the Democratic Party's 2024 platform, the Republican Party's 2024 platform, and our plan — side by side, sourced to the record.
Open the side-by-side comparisonThe homework other parties skip. We did it.
Sourced, cited, costed, and written to a standard that could walk into a legislative office tomorrow. 1,678 words across 0 pillars.
- FTC — Non-compete agreements impact ($488B wage gains)
- StatCounter — Global search and mobile OS market share
- US District Court — United States v. Google (Aug 2024)
- AMA — Competition in health insurance markets
- EPI — CEO-to-worker pay ratio (1965–2024)
- Oxford Internet Institute — Kill zone VC study
- S&P Global — $942.5B in 2024 buybacks
- UT Chattanooga — Municipal broadband ROI study