Trade — Fair Rules, American Workers, Global Leadership
Trade generated $2.6 trillion in gains — while destroying 2.4 million jobs in communities that never recovered. The fix is fair rules, not blanket tariffs.
The two-minute version.
Forty years of offshoring hollowed out manufacturing towns. Blanket tariffs became a consumption tax that cost more jobs than they saved. The trade deficit hit a record $1.21 trillion.
Strategic tariffs only — paired with real investment. Enforceable labor and environmental standards. Real trade adjustment. $500B to rebuild American manufacturing.
Workers get real 80% wage replacement while retraining — not disability. Manufacturing returns to American soil. Allies get fair rules. Consumers stop paying the tariff tax.
Trade liberalization generated $2.6 trillion per year in aggregate US gains. But the distribution was catastrophic: corporate profits' share of GDP rose from 8% to 15.85%, while workers' compensation share fell from 66.6% to 61.9%. The winners won, the losers lost, and the government did almost nothing about it.
When Congress granted China Permanent Normal Trade Relations in 2000, China's share of world manufacturing exports surged from 5% to 15% in a decade. Through at least 2019 — nearly two decades after the shock — affected US communities still had persistently lower employment, lower wages, higher poverty, higher drug and alcohol mortality, and declining public services. Government transfers offset only ~10 cents on the dollar of earnings losses. SSDI payments in affected regions were 30× larger than Trade Adjustment Assistance — the government's primary response was to put displaced workers on disability, not retrain them.
The 2018 steel tariffs 'saved' 8,700–12,700 jobs at a cost of $900,000 per job per year — 13× the average steelworker salary. Downstream manufacturers paid $5.6 billion more in input costs, and downstream job losses (~75,000) far exceeded jobs saved. The 2025 'Liberation Day' blanket tariffs caused apparel prices to rise 17%, food prices to rise 2.8%, and the average household to pay $1,800/year more. The bottom income decile bore 2.5× the burden as a share of income compared to the top decile.
The US goods trade deficit hit a record $1.21 trillion in 2024. Growing trade deficits explain 59% of manufacturing job losses since 1998. The deficit reflects the dollar's role as global reserve currency, domestic underinvestment in manufacturing, and corporate offshoring incentivized by the tax code. Blanket tariffs address none of these.
How the US compares.
What Americans face vs. what peer nations achieve.
| Measure | US | Peer Nation |
|---|---|---|
| Active labor market program spending | 0.1% GDP | 2.0%(🇩🇰 Denmark) |
| Unemployment benefit replacement rate | ~27% / 26 weeks | 90% / 2 years(🇩🇰 Denmark flexicurity) |
| Manufacturing share of GDP | 10–11% | 17.8%(🇩🇪 Germany) |
| NAFTA trade balance (1993 → 2024) | $1.7B surplus → $100B+ deficit | Reversed(Catastrophic) |
"Trade is not the enemy. Trade policy designed to serve capital at the expense of labor is the enemy. Fix the policy."
— The Common Good Party — Trade Policy
What the CGP plan actually does
For American workers, displaced workers finally move into meaningful retraining — not onto disability rolls. 80% wage replacement for two years gives them time to retrain without panic. Full retraining funding, no caps. Relocation assistance. Healthcare bridge. Retirement bridge for workers 55+ who cannot realistically retrain. The Federal Jobs Guarantee (Issue 13) provides $20/hour government jobs immediately while retraining is arranged.
For American manufacturing, the American Industrial Renaissance Act rebuilds domestic capacity in critical sectors — semiconductors, batteries, clean energy, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals. 50 Fraunhofer institutes by year 10 connect university research to manufacturing scale-up. A National Manufacturing Bank provides patient capital for long-horizon investments private markets chronically underfund. All public money comes with prevailing wage and union neutrality — public dollars build union jobs. The CHIPS Act precedent: $280B public spending catalyzed $600B+ in private investment.
For consumers, blanket tariffs end. No more $1,800/year regressive tariff tax hitting low-income families hardest. Strategic tariffs pair with domestic investment so the tariff need shrinks over time (5-year sunset unless capacity actually grew). Supply chain transparency creates market accountability. Pharmaceutical API production becomes domestic — ending dependence on Chinese manufacturers for critical medications.
For trading partners and the global economy, enforceable labor and environmental standards lift workers everywhere — not a race to the bottom. The USMCA Rapid Response Mechanism already helped 42,000+ Mexican workers win better wages and free union elections. The US Carbon Border Adjustment paired with the EU CBAM creates a transatlantic carbon-priced zone covering ~40% of global GDP — the most significant climate-trade instrument in history.
What changes on day one
"The USMCA Rapid Response Mechanism resolved 32+ cases and helped 42,000+ workers in 45 days on average — compared to 25 years of nothing under NAFTA. Enforceable beats voluntary."
— CGP Trade Paper — §Our Policy Pillar 2
See where every side actually stands.
Current federal law, the Democratic Party's 2024 platform, the Republican Party's 2024 platform, and our plan — side by side, sourced to the record.
Open the side-by-side comparisonThe homework other parties skip. We did it.
Sourced, cited, costed, and written to a standard that could walk into a legislative office tomorrow. 1,643 words across 9 pillars.
- Autor, Dorn & Hanson (2013) — 982,000 direct manufacturing jobs lost
- EPI — 3.7M manufacturing jobs lost to China trade deficit
- USTR — USMCA Rapid Response Mechanism (32+ cases, 42,000+ workers)
- CHIPS.gov — CHIPS Act investment catalysis
- EU — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (operational 2026)
- Lane (2021) — Manufacturing Revolutions: South Korea industrial policy welfare gains
- OECD Employment Outlook 2024 — Active labor market program spending
- Acemoglu et al. (2016) — China Shock total job loss (2.0–2.4M)