Median Black household wealth is projected to reach zero by 2053. The wealth gap between white and Black families is 8 to 1. Closing the racial wealth gap is not charity — it is economic policy.
We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page breaks down our racial justice plan — but there's much more to explore.
The median white household in America holds $188,200 in wealth. The median Black household holds $24,100. That is an 8-to-1 ratio — and it has barely changed in fifty years. Without structural intervention, the median Black household is projected to have zero wealth by 2053.
The wealth gap is not an income gap, though income disparities exist too. Wealth is what you own minus what you owe — homes, savings, investments, businesses. It is the safety net that lets you survive a job loss, the down payment that lets you buy a home, the inheritance that gives your children a head start. White families have had centuries to accumulate these assets through government programs — the Homestead Act, FHA loans, the GI Bill — that explicitly or effectively excluded Black Americans.
Homeownership is the primary wealth-building tool for most American families, and the gap is staggering: 73% of white households own their home, compared to just 44% of Black households. This 29-percentage-point gap is a direct legacy of redlining, racially restrictive covenants, and discriminatory lending practices that persisted well into the 1970s — and whose effects compound with every generation.
The disparities extend across every dimension of economic life. Black unemployment has consistently been roughly double white unemployment for the past sixty years, regardless of the overall economy. Black maternal mortality is 2.6 times higher than white maternal mortality. Schools in predominantly Black neighborhoods receive an average of $2,226 less per student in funding than schools in predominantly white neighborhoods. These are not isolated statistics — they are interconnected symptoms of the same structural problem.
| Indicator | White | Black | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median household wealth | $188,200 | $24,100 | 8:1 |
| Homeownership rate | 73% | 44% | 1.7:1 |
| Unemployment rate | ~3.5% | ~7% | 2:1 |
| Maternal mortality | 26.6 per 100K | 69.9 per 100K | 2.6:1 |
| Median household income | $77,999 | $52,860 | 1.5:1 |
Sources: Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances, U.S. Census Bureau, CDC National Vital Statistics. See the full racial justice issue page for complete sourcing.
The racial wealth gap is not a mystery. It was created by specific policies over four centuries — and those policies have names, dates, and authors. Understanding the cause is essential to designing the solution.
Slavery (1619-1865) extracted an estimated $14 trillion in unpaid labor from enslaved Black Americans (in today's dollars). That wealth did not disappear — it was transferred to white slaveholders, their descendants, and the broader economy. At emancipation, four million formerly enslaved people were released with no land, no capital, no education, and no reparations. The promise of "forty acres and a mule" was rescinded. The starting line was not merely unequal — it was nonexistent.
Jim Crow (1877-1965) codified racial exclusion in law for nearly a century after emancipation. Black Americans were barred from white schools, neighborhoods, businesses, and ballot boxes. Sharecropping replaced slavery as a mechanism of economic extraction. Convict leasing — renting incarcerated Black men to private companies — continued forced labor under a different name.
Redlining (1934-1968) was the federal government's deliberate policy of denying mortgages and insurance to Black neighborhoods. The FHA, created to expand homeownership, explicitly excluded Black families. The GI Bill — which built the white middle class after World War II — was administered through local VA offices that routinely denied benefits to Black veterans. Of the 67,000 mortgages insured by the GI Bill in New York and northern New Jersey, fewer than 100 went to non-white borrowers.
Mass incarceration emerged in the 1970s and accelerated through the War on Drugs. Despite similar rates of drug use across races, Black Americans are incarcerated for drug offenses at nearly six times the rate of white Americans. One in three Black men born today will be incarcerated at some point in their lives. A criminal record destroys wealth: it reduces lifetime earnings by an average of 40%, creates barriers to housing and employment, and strips voting rights in many states. See the criminal justice learn page for full detail.
Hiring discrimination persists today. A landmark study found that resumes with "white-sounding" names received 50% more callbacks than identical resumes with "Black-sounding" names. Algorithmic hiring tools trained on historical data perpetuate these biases at scale. The result: even with the same education and qualifications, Black workers earn less, are promoted less frequently, and accumulate less retirement savings.
Wealth compounds over generations. A white family that bought a home with a GI Bill mortgage in 1950 and passed it to their children — who used the equity to fund college and buy their own homes — has accumulated hundreds of thousands of dollars in wealth that traces directly back to a government program Black families were excluded from. The wealth gap is not about individual choices. It is about compounding returns on a head start that was given to one group and denied to another.
The Common Good plan attacks the racial wealth gap from multiple directions simultaneously — because the gap was created by multiple policies working together, and it can only be closed the same way.
Each provision addresses a specific mechanism through which the wealth gap is created and sustained. Most are race-neutral in design but equity-driven in impact: they provide the greatest benefit to those with the greatest need, which — because of historical policy — disproportionately includes Black and Latino Americans.
For the complete plan with legislative detail, cost projections, and sourcing, see the full racial justice issue page.
Racial and ethnic inequality exists in every multiracial society. But the depth of America's racial wealth gap, the scale of its incarceration disparity, and the weakness of its anti-discrimination enforcement are exceptional among wealthy democracies.
| Country | Wealth Gap | Incarceration Disparity | Maternal Mortality Gap | Anti-Discrimination Law | Equity Programs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 8:1 (white/Black) | 5.8:1 | 2.6:1 | Moderate | Limited |
| United Kingdom | ~2:1 (white/Black) | 3:1 | 1.4:1 | Strong | Moderate |
| Canada | ~3:1 (white/Indigenous) | 9:1 (Indigenous) | 1.5:1 | Strong | Moderate |
| Brazil | ~4:1 (white/Black) | 1.5:1 | 2:1 | Moderate | Strong (quotas) |
| South Africa | ~10:1 (white/Black) | N/A | N/A | Strong (BEE) | Strong (BEE) |
| France | Not tracked* | Not tracked* | Limited data | Strong | Minimal* |
*France prohibits the collection of racial or ethnic data in the census, making direct comparisons difficult but also limiting the country's ability to identify and address disparities.
The United States stands out not because racial inequality exists — it exists everywhere — but because the scale of its disparities is so extreme and its policy response so inadequate relative to its wealth. Countries like Brazil and South Africa, which share histories of racialized slavery and apartheid, have implemented more aggressive equity programs including racial quotas and broad-based economic empowerment mandates.
The Common Good approach draws from international best practices while addressing the specific mechanisms that created America's gap. For a detailed comparison of party positions, see the Compare Parties page.
In 1934, the Federal Housing Administration created color-coded maps of every major American city. Neighborhoods with Black residents were outlined in red and labeled "hazardous" — making them ineligible for federally backed mortgages. This policy, known as redlining, is the single largest driver of the modern racial wealth gap.
Redlining did not just deny mortgages. It set off a cascade of disinvestment that reshaped American cities for generations. Without access to mortgage credit, Black families could not buy homes. Without homeowners, neighborhoods lost property tax revenue. Without property tax revenue, schools deteriorated. Without good schools, families with resources left. Without a stable residential base, businesses closed. Without businesses, jobs disappeared. The neighborhoods that the FHA marked in red in the 1930s are, overwhelmingly, the same neighborhoods that suffer from concentrated poverty, underfunded schools, and poor health outcomes today.
Health outcomes track directly onto redlining maps. Residents of formerly redlined neighborhoods have higher rates of asthma, diabetes, heart disease, and premature death. They are more likely to live near industrial pollution, less likely to have access to green space, and less likely to have nearby hospitals or clinics. A 2020 study found that life expectancy varies by as much as 30 years between neighborhoods just a few miles apart — differences that follow the FHA's original color-coded lines.
Environmental justice is inseparable from redlining. Because redlined neighborhoods were zoned for industrial use and lacked the political power to resist, they became the default locations for highways, waste facilities, and polluting factories. Black Americans are 75% more likely to live in communities bordering industrial facilities. This is not geography — it is policy. See the climate and environmental justice page for the full environmental equity framework.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 outlawed explicit redlining, but its effects were never remediated. The wealth that white families accumulated through FHA-backed mortgages was never matched by comparable programs for Black families. The Common Good housing plan includes targeted investment in formerly redlined communities, down payment assistance for first-generation homebuyers, and anti-discrimination enforcement in modern lending.
Racial justice policy is one of the most heavily mythologized areas of American politics. Decades of strategic messaging have created a set of beliefs that feel intuitive but are contradicted by the evidence.
Myth: "Racism is basically over. We had a Black president."
Reality: Individual achievement does not erase structural inequality. The election of Barack Obama did not change the 8:1 wealth gap, the 2:1 unemployment gap, the 2.6:1 maternal mortality gap, or the fact that Black men are incarcerated at nearly six times the rate of white men. These disparities are not caused by individual prejudice alone — they are built into systems of housing, lending, education funding, and criminal justice that operate independently of any individual's beliefs. Structural problems require structural solutions.
Myth: "It's about personal responsibility, not policy."
Reality: The wealth gap exists at every level of education, income, and effort. A Black family whose head of household has a college degree has less wealth than a white family whose head of household dropped out of high school. Black families save at higher rates relative to income than white families — but saving more does not close a gap created by centuries of excluded access to assets. Personal responsibility cannot overcome compounding returns on a head start that was systematically denied.
Myth: "Affirmative action is reverse racism."
Reality: Affirmative action was created to counteract centuries of affirmative action for white Americans — the Homestead Act, FHA loans, the GI Bill, union protections, and Social Security coverage were all designed or administered in ways that excluded Black Americans. The largest beneficiaries of affirmative action policies have been white women. Programs that account for historical disadvantage are not "reverse" discrimination — they are an incomplete attempt to level a playing field that was deliberately tilted. The Common Good plan favors race-neutral, income-based policies that achieve equity through universality.
Myth: "The wealth gap is about culture, not policy."
Reality: The wealth gap is a direct, measurable consequence of specific government policies: slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, GI Bill exclusion, discriminatory lending, and mass incarceration. These are not cultural phenomena — they are laws, regulations, and enforcement patterns with authors, dates, and paper trails. When Black families were given equal access to wealth-building tools — as in the brief period of Reconstruction or through modern homeownership assistance programs — they built wealth at the same rates as white families. Culture does not explain a gap that disappears when policy changes.
Click any question to expand the answer.
Have a question not answered here? Read the full racial justice issue page or visit our site-wide FAQ.
Check back soon for policy analysis of racial justice news.
The racial wealth gap was created by policy. It can only be closed by policy. Read the full plan and see exactly how we close it — with sources, costs, and implementation details.