China — Competition Without Catastrophe
China is both competitor and necessary partner. We reject the false choice between Cold War confrontation and naive accommodation.
The two-minute version.
US policy lurches between tariff wars and incoherent retreats, hurting American workers while eroding deterrence in the Pacific.
Compete hard on technology and trade. Deter through capability, not rhetoric. Re-engage on climate — there's no planet without China. Hold Beijing accountable on human rights through multilateral channels.
American workers get manufacturing jobs back — without the tariff tax. Taiwan stays free. Uyghurs see real accountability. And the US leads the clean-energy century instead of handing it to Beijing.
US China policy suffers from strategic incoherence — lurching between confrontation and accommodation without a coherent framework for managing the most consequential bilateral relationship of the 21st century. Taiwan arms sit in backlog while policy flip-flops.
Blanket tariffs cost 80,000+ US manufacturing jobs and triggered $12B in farmer bailouts without reducing the overall trade deficit. Trade rerouted to third countries; the deficit simply moved. Working families paid the tariff tax in their checkout lanes.
Export controls on semiconductors have been incoherent — banning, unbanning, then allowing sales at a 25% revenue share. That signals to Beijing that every restriction is negotiable. The Chip 4 Alliance (US, Taiwan, Japan, Korea) controls 82% of the global semiconductor market, but the US refuses to coordinate its controls with allies.
Paris Agreement withdrawal ceded moral authority on the defining global issue; China produces ~30% of global emissions, which means refusing to engage with them is choosing to lose the climate fight. And on human rights, rhetoric stays loud while Magnitsky sanctions and multilateral coordination stay quiet.
How the US compares.
What Americans face vs. what peer nations achieve.
| Measure | US | Peer Nation |
|---|---|---|
| Approach to China competition | Flip-flop | Coordinated(🇯🇵 Japan ESPA framework) |
| Chip export controls | Incoherent | Unified(Chip 4 Alliance (82% of market)) |
| Trade strategy | Blanket tariffs | De-risking(🇪🇺 EU — targeted only) |
| Climate engagement | Withdrawn | Engaged(EU Critical Raw Materials Act) |
"China is both competitor and necessary partner. We compete on technology, defend Taiwan through deterrence without provocation, and re-engage on climate — because there is no climate solution without Chinese participation."
— The Common Good Party — China Policy
What the CGP plan actually does
For American workers and families, the regressive blanket-tariff consumption tax ends. Industrial policy redirects investment into CHIPS Act manufacturing, rare-earth diversification, and clean-energy production — creating high-wage jobs in domestic supply chains instead of hitting families at the checkout lane. Trade rerouting through third countries is addressed via rules-of-origin enforcement, not by taxing consumer goods.
For Taiwan and regional partners, the $21.5B arms backlog clears. Military-to-military crisis channels rebuild, ensuring deterrence works through clarity, not speeches. The porcupine strategy makes conquest prohibitively costly. AUKUS, JJOC, the Quad, and Chip 4 coordinate an integrated alliance network. Taiwan's people retain the freedom to determine their own future.
For Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Hong Kong diaspora communities, the Forced Labor Prevention Act is rigidly enforced. Global Magnitsky sanctions target officials and companies directly responsible for abuses. Multilateral action raises Beijing's costs and reduces its ability to retaliate against any single nation. Diaspora communities in the US are shielded from transnational repression.
For US tech leadership and free speech, CHIPS Act funding creates a domestic semiconductor industry. TikTok remains available to its 170 million American users — but under universal data-localization rules that apply to every platform, Chinese AND American. US user data lives on US servers under US law. The largest government censorship action in US history is avoided.
What changes on day one
"China produces 30% of global emissions. There is no solution to climate change without Chinese participation. Refusing to cooperate on climate to avoid 'legitimizing' China is choosing to lose the climate fight to win a symbolic point. The planet does not care about political posturing."
— CGP China Paper — §Addressing Counterarguments
See where every side actually stands.
Current federal law, the Democratic Party's 2024 platform, the Republican Party's 2024 platform, and our plan — side by side, sourced to the record.
Open the side-by-side comparisonThe homework other parties skip. We did it.
Sourced, cited, costed, and written to a standard that could walk into a legislative office tomorrow. 1,776 words across 11 pillars.
- Taiwan News — Taiwan arms backlog
- Peterson Institute — Trump tariffs and the trade war impact
- CNAS — The Hellscape strategy to defend Taiwan
- UHRP — Uyghur Human Rights Project sanctions tracker
- USCIRF 2026 Annual Report — Country of Particular Concern
- Reuters — TikTok Oracle joint venture deal
- ICDS — US–China dialogue for strategic stability
- Earth.org — Paris Climate Agreement exit analysis