Ukraine & NATO — Backing Democracy, Deterring Aggression
Russia's invasion is an illegal war of aggression. A sovereign nation's right to self-determination is not negotiable.
The two-minute version.
Russia controls 20% of Ukrainian territory. US support collapsed 44-fold in one year — right when authoritarian aggression needs to be made expensive.
Restore military aid until Ukraine defends its internationally recognized borders. Article 5 is non-negotiable. No amnesty for war crimes. Every actor held to the same law.
Ukraine restored. Deterrence credible. Taiwan safer. And the US defense industry gets modern stockpile replenishment.
The US dedicated $188 billion to Ukraine aid from FY2022–2025 — less than 1% of total federal spending. Security assistance made up roughly $130.7 billion (71%) of that total. But the flow reversed dramatically: FY2025 allocated $3.92 billion, and FY2026 slashed that to $220 million as of February 2026 — a 44-fold reduction right as Russia's occupation entrenches.
Russia now controls approximately 20% of Ukrainian territory, including Crimea, most of Luhansk and Donetsk, and portions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson oblasts. Russian advances in 2025 averaged 70 meters per day near Pokrovsk despite extraordinary casualties. Ukraine has suffered 500,000–600,000 total military casualties (killed plus wounded), and over 15,000 civilians have been killed.
Civilian casualties in 2025 were 31% higher than 2024, driven by deliberate Russian strikes on energy infrastructure — a documented war crimes strategy targeting heating and electricity to break civilian will. Bucha, child deportation, energy-infrastructure attacks, and torture are all the subject of active ICC investigations.
At the start of 2025, the US supplied 20% of all military equipment Ukraine was using. Military analysts describe that 20% as 'the most lethal and important' — long-range precision strike systems, air defense, and intelligence integration European suppliers cannot yet match. The loss of that 20% is not a minor adjustment; it is strategically decisive.
How the US compares.
What Americans face vs. what peer nations achieve.
| Measure | US | Peer Nation |
|---|---|---|
| Russian casualties vs. US WWII total | 1.2–1.3M | ~408K(US WWII dead) |
| US Ukraine aid as % of federal spending | <1% | 2–3%(Cold War defense baseline) |
| NATO allies meeting 2% spending target | 0 | 100%(2014 → 2025) |
| Ukrainian-produced military equipment | 0% | 55%(Up from zero in 2022) |
"If Russia can seize territory by force and keep it, the message to every authoritarian government on earth is that the international system bends to violence. Sovereignty is not negotiable."
— The Common Good Party — Ukraine & NATO Policy
What the CGP plan actually does
For Ukrainians: sovereignty restored; internationally recognized borders defended; no forced cession of Crimea or Donbas; a path to NATO membership when criteria are met; reconstruction funded by frozen Russian assets; perpetrators of documented war crimes prosecuted through the ICC (Bucha, child deportation, energy infrastructure terrorism, torture).
For Europeans: NATO unity strengthened. The 5% defense spending trajectory by 2035 (Hague Summit commitment) provides integrated deterrence. Forward-deployed US capability stays credible and sustained. Russia cannot reconquer neighbors. Article 5 means something, enforceable regardless of which US administration is in office.
For Americans: cost is less than 1% of federal spending — under $20B/year — with roughly 70% flowing back to US defense contractors for stockpile replenishment with modern equipment. Taiwan deterrence is strengthened in parallel: territorial conquest credibly blocked in Europe means the same credibility applies in the Pacific.
For the rules-based international order: the same international law applies to Russia in Ukraine, to Hamas on October 7, and to every other actor. That consistency is the foundation of US credibility. Long-term security spending is lower when authoritarian powers believe their threats will fail.
What changes on day one
"Taiwan is watching Ukraine. A successful Russian territorial conquest emboldens Beijing. Supporting Ukraine is, among other things, the most effective Taiwan deterrence policy available to the United States. The credibility of deterrence is indivisible."
— CGP Ukraine & NATO Paper — Pillar 4
See where every side actually stands.
Current federal law, the Democratic Party's 2024 platform, the Republican Party's 2024 platform, and our plan — side by side, sourced to the record.
Open the side-by-side comparisonThe homework other parties skip. We did it.
Sourced, cited, costed, and written to a standard that could walk into a legislative office tomorrow. 2,179 words across 5 pillars.
- Al Jazeera — The Ukraine war in numbers (February 2026)
- Council on Foreign Relations — How much US aid is going to Ukraine
- NATO — Secretary General's Annual Report 2025
- OHCHR / ReliefWeb — Four years of full-scale invasion: key facts (Feb 2026)
- ABC News — The Trump administration's 28-point Ukraine–Russia peace plan
- Defense News — All NATO allies to meet 2% spending target
- DW — European NATO defense spending rose 20% in 2025
- Ukraine Oversight — Remaining US funding