Myths vs Facts

Infrastructure Myths vs Facts: Why America's Foundation Is Crumbling

The most common claims about infrastructure — tested against engineering data, economic analysis, and international comparisons. No spin, no partisan framing — just the evidence, the sources, and the numbers.

New to the Common Good Party?

We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page debunks the most common infrastructure myths — but there's much more to explore.

1
The Claim

"We can't afford to fix America's infrastructure."

What the Evidence Shows

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimates that the US needs $4.59 trillion in infrastructure investment by 2029 to bring existing systems to a state of good repair. This sounds enormous until you compare it to what the US spends on other priorities: $886 billion per year on defense, $4.5 trillion per year on healthcare, $1.4 trillion per year in foregone revenue from the 2017 tax cuts (over 10 years). The money exists — it is a question of allocation, not affordability.

Failing to invest in infrastructure is far more expensive than investing in it. The ASCE estimates that deteriorating infrastructure costs the average American household $3,300 per year in higher vehicle repair costs, wasted fuel from traffic congestion, lost productivity from unreliable transit, and higher utility bills from inefficient water and energy systems. By 2039, the cumulative cost of inaction is projected to be $10 trillion — more than double the cost of fixing the problem. Deferred maintenance is not savings. It is debt with interest.

Every major economic analysis — including studies by Moody's, the Congressional Budget Office, and the Council of Economic Advisers — finds that infrastructure spending has a fiscal multiplier greater than 1.0, meaning every dollar spent generates more than a dollar in economic activity. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found a multiplier of 1.5-2.0 for infrastructure spending, meaning $1 trillion in investment generates $1.5-2.0 trillion in GDP growth. Infrastructure investment is not a cost — it is an investment that pays returns.

Key Data Point
$3,300/yearAnnual cost of NOT fixing infrastructure (per household)

Deferred maintenance costs more than investment — $10T cumulative by 2039

Learn more: The cost of doing nothing
2
The Claim

"The private sector will handle infrastructure investment."

What the Evidence Shows

Private companies invest in infrastructure that generates profit — toll roads, data centers, private utilities, cell towers. They do not invest in infrastructure that serves the public good but lacks a direct revenue stream: rural roads, public water systems, levees, public transit serving low-income communities, bridges that don't generate tolls, and stormwater systems. The vast majority of US infrastructure — estimated at 70-80% — falls into the non-revenue-generating category that private capital will not fund.

The track record of infrastructure privatization in the US is poor. The Chicago parking meter privatization (2008) transferred a 75-year lease to a Morgan Stanley-led consortium for $1.16 billion — when the asset was worth an estimated $5 billion. Rates tripled, and the city lost control of its own streets. Indiana's toll road privatization resulted in bankruptcy for the private operator. Private water utilities charge 59% more than public utilities for the same service, according to Food & Water Watch analysis. Privatization transfers public assets to private owners, replaces public accountability with profit maximization, and typically costs consumers more.

Countries that lead in infrastructure quality — Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, Germany — all rely on massive public investment, not private markets. Japan's Shinkansen (bullet train), South Korea's internet infrastructure, and Singapore's water system were all built and largely funded by government. The private sector plays a role in construction and operation, but the investment decision, the planning, and the funding come from public sources. No country has built world-class infrastructure through private investment alone.

Key Data Point
59% more expensivePrivate water utilities vs. public utilities (cost difference)

Privatization typically raises costs while reducing public accountability

Learn more: Public vs. private infrastructure investment
3
The Claim

"Infrastructure is boring and not an urgent priority."

What the Evidence Shows

Infrastructure failures kill people. The 2021 Texas power grid collapse killed at least 246 people and caused $195 billion in damage — because the grid was not weatherized despite warnings. The 2018 Camp Fire in Paradise, California — started by faulty PG&E power lines — killed 85 people and destroyed 18,804 structures. The 2021 Surfside condo collapse in Florida killed 98 people due to structural deterioration. The 2023 East Palestine, Ohio train derailment released toxic chemicals because rail safety infrastructure was inadequately maintained. Infrastructure is not boring — it is the physical foundation that determines whether people live or die.

The ASCE gives US infrastructure an overall grade of C-minus. Specific categories are worse: dams received a D, public transit received a D-minus, roads received a D, drinking water received a C-minus, and stormwater infrastructure received a D. There are 7,500 structurally deficient dams in the US, 43,000 structurally deficient bridges, and an estimated 6-10 billion gallons of treated drinking water lost every day through leaking pipes. These are not hypothetical risks — they are active emergencies happening in slow motion.

Infrastructure is invisible when it works, which is why it feels 'boring.' No one thinks about the water treatment plant until the water turns brown. No one thinks about the power grid until the lights go out in a heat wave. No one thinks about the levee until it fails during a hurricane. The perception that infrastructure is boring is a cognitive bias created by the fact that functional infrastructure is experienced as an absence of problems — which is exactly what makes it seem unimportant until it fails catastrophically.

Key Data Point
C-minusASCE infrastructure grade for the United States

Dams: D | Transit: D- | Roads: D | 43,000 structurally deficient bridges

Learn more: America's infrastructure report card
4
The Claim

"New technology will eliminate the need for traditional infrastructure."

5
The Claim

"America's infrastructure is basically fine — it still works."

6
The Claim

"Infrastructure spending is inherently wasteful government spending."

7
The Claim

"Tolls and user fees can pay for all our infrastructure needs."

8
The Claim

"Deregulation is the key to building infrastructure faster."

9
The Claim

"Broadband internet isn't really infrastructure."

10
The Claim

"We should fix potholes, not build high-speed rail."

10
Myths Examined
C-
ASCE Grade
$4.59T
Investment Needed
43K
Deficient Bridges

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most searched infrastructure questions.

Want the full picture on infrastructure?

Read the complete deep-dive guide, explore the full policy, or compare our approach to other parties.

Sources: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Congressional Budget Office, Federal Highway Administration, World Economic Forum, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Moody's Analytics, Food & Water Watch, FCC Broadband Deployment Report, Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

All claims on this page are sourced from peer-reviewed research, government data, or independent policy analysis. See the full infrastructure guide and policy paper for complete citations.