Section 01

Executive Summary

American democracy has a price tag — and most Americans can't afford it. The 2024 elections cost $15.9 billion. Just 1.05% of Americans gave $200 or more, yet that sliver of the population provided 78.45% of all campaign contributions. Princeton researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page documented the result: economic elites have a "substantial independent impact" on U.S. government policy, while average citizens have "near-zero" measurable influence.

The Common Good Party's position is clear: this is not a side issue. It is the issue that determines whether every other issue in this platform is achievable. The corruption tax — the cost every American household pays in inflated drug prices, bloated defense contracts, and foregone regulatory benefits — runs $9,000 to $16,200 per year. That is what regulatory capture and pay-to-play governance cost in concrete terms. Every household. Every year.

Dark money exploded from $127 million in 2010 to $1.9 billion in 2024. A single donor gave $1.6 billion to a 501(c)(4) — the largest known political donation in American history — with no required disclosure. Lobbying hit a record $4.44 billion, generating an estimated $220 return for every dollar spent. The Federal Election Commission deadlocks on approaching 40% of cases by design.

This platform consolidates and extends the campaign finance provisions of Issues 18 and 20 with comprehensive enforcement infrastructure through seven pillars plus an Anti-Corruption Fund: the Sunlight Act, Democracy Funding Act, replacement of the FEC with a Federal Election Integrity Commission, an End Revolving Door Act, a Congressional Ethics Act, an Anti-Capture Act, and FARA Reform. Every dollar traceable. Every election publicly funded. Money out. People in.

Section 02

The Problem

The corruption of American democracy operates through four interlocking systems: the dominance of big money in elections, the explosion of dark money with no accountability, the direct corruption tax paid by ordinary households, and an enforcement agency structurally designed not to enforce.

The Money Dominance Problem
The 2024 elections cost $15.9 billion. Twelve megadonors gave $3.4 billion between 2009 and 2020. Donors giving $5 million or more provided 75%+ of all Super PAC funding. Money does not merely participate in democracy — it dominates it. Gilens and Page's landmark Princeton study found that policies favored by economic elites pass at roughly the same rate whether or not the public supports them; policies favored by average Americans but opposed by elites almost never pass.
The Dark Money Explosion
Dark money — political spending by nonprofits not required to disclose their donors — exploded from $127 million in 2010 to $1.9 billion in 2024. A single donor gave $1.6 billion to Leonard Leo's Marble Freedom Trust — the largest known political donation in American history — routed entirely through a 501(c)(4) with no required public disclosure. Shell company spending enables foreign money and corporate money to flow into elections with no traceability.
The Corruption Tax
The corruption tax is the direct cost Americans pay for regulatory capture. The pharmaceutical industry spent $6.1 billion lobbying to block drug pricing reform — a direct transfer from patients to shareholders. Defense contractors gave $10.2 million in campaign donations and received $45 billion in extra defense spending — a 449,000% return. Total lobbying generated an estimated $220 return per $1 spent. The aggregate cost to American households: $9,000 to $16,200 per year in higher prices and foregone benefits.
The Enforcement Vacuum
The Federal Election Commission was designed to deadlock. Six commissioners split evenly between parties require four votes to act. The FEC deadlocks on approaching 40% of cases, went without a quorum for much of 2019–2020 — killing 300+ pending cases — and dismissed an $18 million Bloomberg campaign finance violation not because it was legal, but because the commission could not agree to act. The FEC is not broken. It is working exactly as designed by those who benefit from impunity.

The revolving door completes the circuit: 866 former members of Congress were registered as lobbyists as of 2025. The average salary increase upon moving from congressional staff to lobbying is 1,452%. A 2022 economic study found that 49% of financial regulators adjusted their enforcement decisions to benefit future private-sector employers. The Supreme Court has no binding ethics code despite documented receipt of $4.2 million in gifts to a single justice. The STOCK Act imposes a $200 penalty for late disclosure — less than the cost of a parking ticket in most cities.

Section 03

How We Got Here

The current campaign finance regime was not the result of democratic failure — it was the result of judicial construction and deliberate legislative design. A series of Supreme Court decisions built an architecture that treats billion-dollar political expenditures as constitutionally protected speech, while Congress built an enforcement agency with structural deadlock baked in.

1976

Buckley v. Valeo — Money Becomes Speech

The Supreme Court equated money with speech, establishing the constitutional framework that has resisted reform for five decades. Buckley upheld contribution limits but struck down expenditure limits — drawing a line that subsequent courts would systematically erase. The premise that a billion-dollar political expenditure is constitutionally equivalent to a street corner speech has never been put to voters. It was imposed by five justices.

2010

Citizens United & SpeechNow — The Floodgates Open

Citizens United v. FEC unleashed unlimited corporate and union spending in elections, ruling that independent expenditures cannot be limited regardless of their source. In the same year, SpeechNow.org v. FEC created Super PACs — entities that can raise and spend unlimited amounts as long as they don't "coordinate" with campaigns, a restriction that in practice has proven unenforceable. Dark money immediately began its exponential growth from $127 million to $1.9 billion in fourteen years.

2014

McCutcheon v. FEC — Aggregate Limits Fall

McCutcheon removed aggregate contribution limits — the total amount any individual could give across all candidates and party committees. Each decision built upon the last, constructing a legal architecture that systematically eliminated every mechanism Congress had enacted to limit the role of concentrated wealth in elections. By 2014, the judicial reconstruction of American campaign finance was effectively complete.

By design

The FEC's Structural Deadlock — Not a Bug

Congress designed the FEC to deadlock. The six-member commission with equal partisan representation and a four-vote threshold was not an accident — it was a deliberate choice by legislators who preferred no enforcement to vigorous enforcement. The dark money architecture completed the picture: 501(c)(4)s are not required to disclose donors, the IRS has treated "primary purpose" as a standard nearly any political operation can satisfy, and crypto donations add a third dimension of obfuscation with no adequate regulatory framework.

Section 04

What Other Countries Do

Every nation that ranks above the United States on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index has robust public financing and disclosure requirements. The relationship is not coincidental. And two American cities have already proven that the model works at scale.

Country / Model CPI Score Key Mechanism Notable Outcome
Denmark 87/100 Public party financing, strict contribution limits Consistently #1 least corrupt country globally on Transparency International rankings
Sweden 81/100 Public financing, short campaign seasons No corporate donations to political parties allowed; campaign duration strictly regulated
United Kingdom Strict spending limits: ~£30,000 per constituency; short regulated campaign period Races decided for tens of thousands of pounds versus millions in equivalent U.S. districts. Campaign period legally limited.
France Presidential cap €22.5M; 47.5% state reimbursement; TV ad ban; equal TV time for all candidates Public financing + equal media access + spending caps. No paid political TV advertising during campaigns.
Canada Individual donation cap of C$1,725; corporate and union donations banned since 2004 No corporate money in politics at all. Per-vote public subsidy (eliminated 2015 but replaced by tax credit system).
Germany Public financing proportional to votes received + membership dues; disclosure required above €10,000 Parties funded primarily through public grants and member contributions, not large donors.
Japan Public financing since 1994; individual donation cap ¥1.5M (~$10,000); corporate donations restricted Public subsidy system allocates ~$250M/year to parties based on seats and vote share.
New York City (U.S. model) 8:1 small-dollar matching for contributions under $250 Women on city council: 27% → 61%. Donor pool broadened dramatically to include non-wealthy New Yorkers.
Seattle (U.S. model) Democracy Vouchers ($13/property/year) 48,071 participants; Black political participation doubled; cost: $13 per property per year

The key lesson: public financing amplifies speech, it does not suppress it. NYC's 8:1 matching program did not produce a homogeneous council — it produced a more diverse one. Seattle's Democracy Vouchers did not reduce participation — they doubled Black participation and expanded the donor base from a wealthy sliver to tens of thousands of ordinary residents. Nations with strong public financing consistently rank at the top of global anti-corruption indices. The evidence is not ambiguous.

Section 05

Our Policy — The 7 Pillars

The Common Good Party's campaign finance platform attacks corruption at every layer — disclosure, public funding, enforcement, revolving door, congressional ethics, regulatory capture, and foreign influence. Each pillar is specific and enforceable. Together, they constitute a complete overhaul.

Pillar 01

The Sunlight Act — Full Disclosure

87% of Americans support campaign finance disclosure requirements across party lines. The only people who benefit from anonymity are those whose spending would not survive scrutiny. This pillar closes every known avenue for secret political money.

  • Mandatory disclosure of all political spending over $200 — no exceptions
  • Close the 501(c)(4) loophole: any organization spending over $10,000 on political activity must disclose all donors who gave $200 or more
  • Ban shell company spending: no political expenditure may be made by any entity that does not disclose its ultimate human beneficial owners — no more layered nonprofit structures obscuring the original source
  • Real-time 24-hour disclosure for all contributions over $1,000 within 30 days of an election
  • Full traceability required with treble damages for willful evasion — hiding money is penalized three times as heavily as the amount hidden
  • Regulate cryptocurrency political contributions: all crypto donations subject to identical disclosure rules as cash — no anonymous wallets, no blockchain obfuscation
Enforcement: FEIC (replacing FEC) · Treble damages for evasion · Real-time disclosure database · 87% bipartisan public support
Pillar 02

The Democracy Funding Act — Public Financing

The NYC and Seattle models prove that public financing works — and that it changes who runs, who wins, and who gets represented. The federal version scales these proven mechanisms nationally at a cost of roughly $3.50 per taxpayer per year.

  • 8:1 small-dollar matching for contributions of $200 and under (NYC model): a $50 donation becomes a $450 investment in your preferred candidate — making every small donor competitive with wealthy bundlers
  • $100 Democracy Vouchers per registered voter (Seattle model): every American adult receives $100 in vouchers redeemable for any participating federal candidate
  • Participating candidates must agree to: no donations over $500, no corporate or PAC money, and mandatory participation in at least two public debates
  • Cost: approximately $475 million per year — roughly $3.50 per taxpayer — compared to the $9,000–$16,200 annual corruption tax households currently pay

NYC's matching program transformed the city council from 27% to 61% women. Seattle's Democracy Vouchers doubled Black political participation and enrolled 48,071 participants at $13 per property per year. This is the investment required to make every voter a meaningful political donor, not just the 1.05% who currently drive 78.45% of all contributions.

Enforcement: FEIC administration · Participating candidate compliance audits · Democracy Voucher distribution through voter registration system
Pillar 03

Federal Election Integrity Commission — Replace the FEC

You cannot fix the FEC. You abolish it. The structural deadlock is not a malfunction — it is a feature deliberately designed by legislators who prefer impunity. The solution is replacement.

  • Abolish the Federal Election Commission entirely
  • Replace with a 5-member Federal Election Integrity Commission — odd number eliminates structural deadlock by design
  • No more than two commissioners from any political party — ending the partisan veto structure
  • Commissioners appointed through an independent judicial selection process, not by partisan congressional leaders — removing the self-interest from appointments
  • Subpoena power with penalties up to $100,000 or 300% of the violation, whichever is greater
  • Whistleblower rewards of 15–30% of penalties collected — creating a financial incentive to report violations

Full Mandatory Duty to Act Standard: 30-day investigation trigger upon credible complaint; inaction defaults to action at 30 days; 180-day disposition deadline; no-deadlock rule (majority vote sufficient); mandamus jurisdiction for courts to compel FEIC action; individual commissioner accountability for willful inaction; annual public report on all complaints and dispositions.

Enforcement: Mandatory Duty to Act Standard · Majority vote sufficient — no more deadlock · Individual commissioner accountability · Court-compellable action
Pillar 04

End the Revolving Door Act

866 former members of Congress were registered as lobbyists as of 2025. The average salary increase from congressional staff to lobbying is 1,452%. 49% of financial regulators adjusted enforcement decisions to benefit future private employers. The revolving door is not how you get expertise into government — it is how you get capture.

  • 10-year cooling-off period for senior federal officials before lobbying their former agency — extended from the current 1–2 year window that has proven ineffective
  • Lifetime ban on foreign lobbying for any former federal official — no exceptions, no waivers
  • Criminal penalties for violations — not civil fines that can be priced in as a cost of doing business
  • Anti-capture provisions: no industry executive may lead the agency regulating their industry within 10 years of employment there — ending the Boeing model of regulatory capture
  • Post-regulatory 5-year ban on joining regulated entities for senior regulators — the cooling-off works both directions
  • Shadow lobbying registration required for all "strategic advisors," "consultants," and "government affairs" professionals who communicate with federal officials — closing the informal influence loophole
  • Full pay disclosure for all registered lobbyists — transparency on who is being paid how much to say what
Enforcement: DOJ criminal penalties for violations · FEIC shadow lobbying registry · Anti-capture provisions in agency ethics rules
Pillar 05

Congressional Ethics Act

The current STOCK Act penalty for late disclosure is $200. Clarence Thomas received $4.2 million in undisclosed gifts. Members of Congress trade on inside information with no meaningful consequence. The Supreme Court has no binding ethics code. This pillar installs one for Congress and extends it to the Court.

  • Independent Ethics Office with full investigative authority and Mandatory Duty to Act Standard (30-day trigger, 180-day disposition) — replacing the current self-policing structure
  • Stock trading ban with real enforcement: all members of Congress must either divest individual stock holdings or place them in a qualified blind trust within 180 days of taking office; violation means forfeiture of all profits plus a 3× fine
  • Real-time financial disclosure: all trades disclosed within 48 hours, not the current 45-day window that allows acting on information before disclosure
  • SCOTUS binding ethics code: Congress has constitutional authority to impose binding ethics rules on the Supreme Court — the era of $4.2 million in undisclosed gifts with no consequence ends
  • Tax return transparency: 10 most recent returns required for all federal candidates — voters deserve to know who is asking for their votes and their money
  • Mandatory candidate disclosure of all significant business relationships and conflicts of interest
Enforcement: Independent Ethics Office (Mandatory Duty to Act) · 3× fine for trading violations · SCOTUS binding ethics by statute
Pillar 06

Anti-Capture Act

Regulatory capture is the mechanism through which the corruption tax is collected. The Boeing model — where the FAA allowed Boeing to certify its own aircraft safety — produced two crashes and 346 deaths. This pillar ends industry self-certification and installs structural independence across the regulatory system.

  • Ban self-certification in safety-critical industries: no regulated entity may certify its own products or processes to federal safety standards — the agency responsible for safety must be the one that verifies it
  • Advisory committee reform: all federal advisory committees must have a majority of public interest representatives — ending the practice of regulated industries staffing the bodies that advise their regulators
  • Inspector General independence with Mandatory Duty to Act: 30-day investigation trigger upon credible complaint, inaction defaults to referral to DOJ, IGs cannot be fired without Senate approval — ending retaliatory dismissals
  • Whistleblower superprotections: treble damages for retaliation against whistleblowers, rewards of 15–30% of penalties collected from cases brought to light, and full identity protection for anonymous reports
Enforcement: IG Mandatory Duty to Act · Senate approval required to fire IGs · Treble damages for retaliation · Whistleblower reward fund
Pillar 07

FARA Reform — Foreign Influence Transparency

The Foreign Agents Registration Act exists to ensure Americans know when foreign governments are attempting to influence U.S. policy. The GAO has documented that DOJ rarely prosecutes FARA violations despite widespread noncompliance. The LDA loophole — which allows most foreign-funded lobbyists to register under the weaker Lobbying Disclosure Act — guts the law's core purpose.

  • Close the LDA loophole: any lobbyist who contacts a federal official on behalf of a foreign principal must register under FARA — not the weaker LDA standard that most foreign-funded actors exploit
  • Lifetime foreign lobbying ban for former senior federal officials — the current two-year cooling-off period is entirely inadequate for the scale of relationships being monetized
  • Dedicated DOJ FARA Unit with Mandatory Duty to Act: 100+ enforcement actions per year target; current FARA enforcement is near-zero despite widespread noncompliance documented by the GAO
  • Ban and require disclosure of foreign government funding for think tanks and policy organizations that testify before Congress or seek to influence federal policy
  • Enhanced disclosure requirements for organizations with foreign-interest missions that engage in domestic political activity
Enforcement: Dedicated DOJ FARA Unit · Mandatory Duty to Act · 100+ enforcement actions per year target · Lifetime ban for senior officials

The Anti-Corruption Fund — The Self-Reinforcing Engine

All fines, penalties, and treble damages collected under the Sunlight Act, Democracy Funding Act, FEIC, Congressional Ethics Act, Anti-Capture Act, and FARA Reform flow into a dedicated Anti-Corruption Fund. This fund is self-reinforcing: the more violations are caught and penalized, the more resources are available to fund enforcement. The system pays for itself through the penalties it collects.

  • Democracy Vouchers and small-dollar matching: funded and sustained by enforcement revenue
  • Independent Ethics Office operating budget: funded by congressional ethics violation penalties
  • FARA enforcement unit: funded by foreign lobbying violation penalties
  • Whistleblower rewards: funded directly from the penalties whistleblowers help generate
  • FEIC operations: funded by campaign finance violation penalties at 300% of the violation amount

A vigorous enforcement regime generates increasing resources to fund the democracy infrastructure that reduces the need for enforcement over time. This is not a cost center — it is a revenue engine aligned with the public interest.

Section 06

How We Pay For It

The total new spending cost of this platform is approximately $3.50 per taxpayer per year — compared to the $9,000–$16,200 annual corruption tax Americans currently pay. Most elements require budget reallocation, not new appropriations. The Anti-Corruption Fund creates a self-reinforcing enforcement mechanism that generates its own revenue through penalties.

Democracy Vouchers ~$16B per election cycle
Federal appropriation seeded by Anti-Corruption Fund penalty revenue. The CBO estimated the For the People Act's public financing provisions at ~$2.7B over 10 years — less than one week of current annual lobbying spending. The full voucher program scales with the registered voter base.
8:1 Small-Dollar Matching ~$475M/year
Approximately $3.50 per taxpayer per year — compared to thousands of dollars per household in annual corruption costs. Self-reinforcing as the program matures: more small donors participating means less dependence on large-donor infrastructure that drives regulatory capture.
Replace FEC with FEIC Budget reallocation
FEC budget reallocation (~$100M/year existing budget). The FEIC's enforcement revenue — penalties at 300% of violations — is expected to substantially exceed operating costs in steady state, with surplus flowing to the Anti-Corruption Fund.
Independent Ethics Office ~$50M/year
Funded by reallocation from existing House and Senate ethics committee budgets plus penalty revenue from congressional ethics violations. The 3× fine structure and stock trading violation forfeitures are expected to make this office largely self-sustaining.
Anti-Capture & IG Reforms Minimal new cost
IGs already exist in every major federal agency. Independence reforms (Senate approval to fire, Mandatory Duty to Act) require statutory changes, not new appropriations. Advisory committee reform is administrative, not financial. Whistleblower rewards fund themselves from the penalties they generate.
FARA Enforcement Unit ~$30M/year
DOJ budget reallocation. Current FARA enforcement is near-zero. The dedicated unit at 100+ enforcement actions per year generates penalty revenue expected to substantially exceed operating cost, with surplus directed to the Anti-Corruption Fund.
Anti-Corruption Fund Self-funding
Funded entirely by penalties, fines, and treble damages collected across all enforcement pillars. The more violations are caught and penalized, the more resources flow into democracy infrastructure. The system is designed to generate increasing revenue as enforcement ramps up, then to reduce violations — and therefore its own revenue needs — over time.
Section 07

Implementation Timeline

The sequencing prioritizes immediate executive action on revolving door and FARA enforcement, followed by the legislative foundation for disclosure and public financing, then the structural reforms to the FEC and ethics infrastructure, and finally the long-game constitutional amendment.

Phase 1 — Executive Action

Months 1–6

  • Executive order: tax return disclosure required for all federal contractors
  • Revolving door freeze for senior officials pending legislation
  • DOJ FARA enforcement surge begins
  • Introduce Citizens United constitutional amendment in Congress
  • Introduce Sunlight Act

Phase 2 — Foundation

Months 6–18

  • Sunlight Act enacted — full disclosure live
  • Democracy Funding Act passed
  • FEC abolished; FEIC operational with subpoena power
  • Anti-Capture Act enacted
  • Anti-Corruption Fund operational

Phase 3 — Ethics & FARA

Years 2–3

  • Congressional Ethics Act enacted
  • SCOTUS binding ethics code in force
  • Shadow lobbying registration system live
  • Full FARA Reform in effect
  • Anti-Corruption Fund self-sustaining

Phase 4 — Amendment Campaign

Years 3–5

  • Constitutional amendment ratification campaign active (23 states already on record; need 38)
  • Full national Democracy Voucher program at scale
  • FEIC enforcement reaches 100+ actions/year
  • Dark money effectively eliminated through enforcement

Phase 5 — Full Reform

Year 5+

  • Citizens United constitutional amendment ratified
  • Full public financing permanently in place
  • U.S. enters top-10 of Transparency International CPI
  • Annual corruption cost to households measurably declining
Section 08

Addressing Counterarguments

The arguments against campaign finance reform are funded by the people who benefit from the current system. Here is what the evidence actually shows.

"This restricts free speech."

Money is not speech. The First Amendment protects expression, not financial transactions. Disclosure requirements do not restrict what anyone can say — they ensure voters know who is saying it. Public financing does not suppress speech — it amplifies it by giving millions of small donors the same platform access that billionaires currently buy. 87% of Americans support campaign finance disclosure requirements across party lines. The argument that transparency "restricts speech" is made almost exclusively by those whose spending would not survive public scrutiny. That is not a constitutional principle. It is a preference for anonymity.

"Public financing is a waste of taxpayer money."

The corruption tax costs American households $9,000–$16,200 per year in inflated drug prices, bloated defense contracts, and foregone regulatory benefits. Democracy Vouchers cost $13 per property per year in Seattle. Small-dollar matching costs roughly $3.50 per taxpayer annually at the federal level. Defense contractors gave $10.2 million in campaign donations and received $45 billion in extra defense spending — a 449,000% return on investment. The question is not whether public financing is expensive. It is whether the current system is cheaper. The answer is no — by four orders of magnitude. NYC and Seattle prove the model works at scale and produces measurably more representative outcomes.

"You can't fix the FEC."

Correct. You can't fix the FEC — which is why this platform abolishes it. The FEC's dysfunction is not a malfunction. It is a feature deliberately designed by legislators who preferred no enforcement to vigorous enforcement. A 5-member Federal Election Integrity Commission with no more than two members from any party, appointed through an independent judicial process, operating under a mandatory Duty to Act standard, eliminates structural deadlock by design rather than working around it. The $18 million Bloomberg violation that the FEC dismissed — not because it was legal, but because it could not agree to act — would be investigated and resolved under the FEIC within 180 days. That is the difference between a commission designed to enforce and one designed not to.

"The revolving door is how you get expertise."

Ten years is not forever. Expertise does not require capture. The economic research is unambiguous: a 2022 study found that 49% of financial regulators adjusted their enforcement decisions to benefit future private-sector employers. That is not expertise informing government — that is a structural conflict of interest corrupting enforcement. Anti-capture provisions that prevent industry executives from immediately leading the agencies that regulate their industry do not prevent expertise from entering government. They prevent the most conflicted appointments from happening. There is no shortage of financial experts who have not spent the last decade working for the institutions they would regulate.

"Dark money is protected speech."

Political spending is a public act directed at influencing government — not private association. NAACP v. Alabama (1958), which protected membership lists from compelled government disclosure, involved private associational records. Political spending directed at elections is categorically different: it is an attempt to influence public governance. The Constitution permits — and democracy requires — knowing who is attempting to buy it. A $1.6 billion donation to a political nonprofit routed through a 501(c)(4) is not a private act of association. It is the largest known attempt to purchase political influence in American history. It should be disclosed.

Section 09

Key Statistics

The following statistics underpin the policy positions in this document. Each is sourced from nonpartisan research organizations, government data, or established investigative reporting.

$15.9 billion Total cost of the 2024 elections — the most expensive in U.S. history Source: OpenSecrets
1.05% / 78.45% Americans giving $200+ (1.05%) who provided 78.45% of all campaign contributions — democracy funded by a tiny sliver Source: OpenSecrets
$127M → $1.9B Dark money growth from 2010 (Citizens United) to 2024 — a 15× increase in 14 years Source: OpenSecrets Dark Money Tracker
$4.44 billion Record lobbying spending in 2024 — generating an estimated $220 return per $1 spent through regulatory capture Source: OpenSecrets Lobbying
$9K–$16.2K Corruption tax per American household per year — the direct cost of regulatory capture in inflated prices and foregone benefits Source: Represent.us
Near-zero influence Average citizens' measurable impact on U.S. policy, per Princeton researchers Gilens and Page — while economic elites have "substantial independent impact" Source: Gilens & Page, Princeton
~40% deadlock rate FEC deadlock rate — the enforcement agency built by Congress to fail; went without a quorum for most of 2019–2020, killing 300+ cases Source: OpenSecrets FEC Analysis
866 lobbyists Former members of Congress registered as lobbyists as of 2025 — converting public service into private leverage Source: OpenSecrets Revolving Door
1,452% Average salary increase for congressional staff moving to the lobbying sector — the financial incentive driving the revolving door Source: OpenSecrets
$4.2 million Documented undisclosed gifts received by a single Supreme Court justice — the Court has no binding ethics code Source: ProPublica investigation
$200 penalty STOCK Act late disclosure fine for members of Congress trading on inside information — a rounding error for anyone acting on material non-public knowledge Source: Congressional Research Service
27% → 61% Women on the NYC City Council before and after the 8:1 small-dollar matching program — public financing changes who runs and who wins Source: NYC Campaign Finance Board
48,071 participants Seattle Democracy Voucher participants — doubling Black political participation at a cost of $13 per property per year Source: City of Seattle
$3.50 / taxpayer Annual cost of the federal small-dollar matching program — versus $9,000–$16,200 per household in annual corruption costs Source: CBO / Represent.us
Section 10

Cross-References

Campaign finance and political corruption intersect with every policy domain in this platform — because the corruption of the legislative process is what prevents every other reform from being enacted. The following cross-references identify the most direct policy connections.

#2 Taxation Dark money tax loopholes through 501(c)(4)s; donor benefit transparency; charitable deduction abuse by politically active nonprofits; wealth tax reduces the concentration that fuels mega-donations.
#9 Defense Spending Pentagon audit requirements; defense contractor lobbying restrictions; the revolving door between DOD and defense industry is among the most documented and costly instances of regulatory capture.
#18 Voting Rights Citizens United constitutional amendment; public campaign funding; ban on PAC spending in federal elections; ranked-choice voting — this pillar and Issue 18 are the twin pillars of democratic integrity.
#20 Corporate Power & Antitrust Congressional stock trading ban; criminal lobbying penalties; CINA investment restrictions; anti-capture provisions that prevent corporate executives from immediately running the agencies that regulate them.
#21 Internet, Privacy & Big Tech Cryptocurrency political donation regulation; political ad transparency requirements; AI-generated deepfake disclosure in political advertising; platform accountability for dark money ads.
#22 Racial Justice Voter suppression enforcement; corporate racial accountability; dark money operations that have disproportionately targeted minority communities with disinformation; Democracy Vouchers that doubled Black political participation in Seattle.
"This is not a side issue. It is the issue that determines whether every other issue in this platform is achievable. Money out. People in. Everything else follows."
— The Common Good Party
Paid for by The Common Good Party (thecommongoodparty.com) and not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.