"Immigrants take jobs from American workers."
The economic consensus on this question is remarkably strong. A comprehensive review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) found that immigration has an overall positive impact on long-run economic growth and that its effects on the wages and employment of native-born workers are very small. Immigrants and native-born workers largely complement each other rather than competing for the same jobs — they tend to work in different occupations and have different skill profiles.
Immigrants fill critical gaps at both ends of the skill spectrum. At the high end, immigrants make up 45% of medical research scientists, 36% of software developers in Silicon Valley, and over 50% of PhD-holding STEM workers. At the entry level, immigrants fill agricultural, construction, food processing, and care economy jobs that have persistent labor shortages. The Bureau of Labor Statistics consistently finds that sectors with high immigrant employment do not show higher unemployment among native-born workers.
Where there is a real effect, it is small and concentrated. Some studies find modest wage pressure on native-born workers without a high school diploma — roughly 2-5% over a decade. But even this is debated, and compensating effects (lower consumer prices, business creation by immigrants, increased demand for goods and services) offset the wage impact. Immigrants are 80% more likely to start businesses than native-born Americans, creating jobs rather than taking them.
55% of US billion-dollar startups have an immigrant founder