Myths vs Facts

Affordability Myths vs Facts: Why the Richest Nation Can't Afford to Live

The most common claims about why things cost so much — tested against economic data, international comparisons, and historical trends. No spin, no partisan framing — just the evidence, the sources, and the numbers.

New to the Common Good Party?

We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page debunks the most common affordability myths — but there's much more to explore.

1
The Claim

"If you just work harder, you can afford a good life."

What the Evidence Shows

American workers are more productive than ever. Labor productivity has increased 64% since 1979 — meaning workers produce 64% more value per hour today than they did 45 years ago. If wages had kept pace with productivity, the median worker would earn approximately $97,000 per year. Instead, median wages have barely budged in real terms, hovering around $56,000. The gap between what Americans produce and what they earn is the defining economic story of the past half-century — and it has nothing to do with how hard people work.

The United States already has the longest average working hours of any wealthy nation. American workers work 1,811 hours per year on average — 400 more than German workers, 200 more than the French, and 100 more than the Japanese. Americans take fewer vacation days, have no guaranteed paid family leave, and are more likely to work multiple jobs than workers in any comparable country. If 'working harder' were the solution to affordability, Americans would be the most financially secure workers on Earth. They aren't.

The 'work harder' narrative serves a specific ideological function: it locates the cause of economic hardship in individual behavior rather than structural policy. If the problem is that people aren't working hard enough, then no systemic change is needed. But when productivity rises 64% and wages rise 1%, the problem is not effort — it's distribution. The value is being created. It's just not flowing to the people who create it. That is a policy choice, not a moral failing.

Key Data Point
64% vs. ~1%Productivity increase vs. wage increase since 1979

If wages tracked productivity, median pay would be ~$97,000/year

Learn more: The productivity-wage gap explained
2
The Claim

"Inflation is just temporary — prices will come back down."

What the Evidence Shows

Inflation is the rate at which prices increase — not a temporary surge that reverses. When politicians and pundits say 'inflation is coming down,' they mean prices are rising more slowly, not that prices are falling. A 3% inflation rate followed by a 2% inflation rate means prices are still going up — just less quickly. The cost of groceries, housing, healthcare, and education does not return to previous levels when inflation slows. It remains permanently higher. Americans who experienced 20% cumulative inflation from 2020-2024 will never see those prices return to pre-2020 levels under normal economic conditions.

More importantly, the 2021-2023 inflation spike was not driven primarily by government spending, as is often claimed. Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, the European Central Bank, and multiple independent economists found that 54-60% of inflation was driven by corporate profit margin expansion. Companies used supply chain disruptions as cover to raise prices beyond their increased costs — a practice economists call 'greedflation.' Corporate profit margins hit 70-year highs during the inflationary period, which would not have occurred if price increases merely reflected cost increases.

The structural affordability crisis predates the recent inflation spike by decades. The cost of housing has increased 149% since 2000 while median income has increased 52%. The cost of college tuition has increased 1,200% since 1980, outpacing inflation by a factor of four. Healthcare costs have tripled since 2000. These are not inflationary blips — they are long-term trends driven by market concentration, regulatory capture, and policy choices that prioritize corporate profitability over consumer welfare.

Key Data Point
54-60%Share of 2021-2023 inflation driven by corporate profit margin expansion

Corporate profit margins hit 70-year highs during the inflation spike

Learn more: What actually drove inflation
3
The Claim

"The free market will fix high prices through competition."

What the Evidence Shows

Competition fixes prices only when competition exists. In sector after sector of the American economy, consolidation has eliminated the competition that markets require to function. Four companies control 85% of the US beef market. Four companies control 66% of the airline industry. Three companies control 80% of the mobile phone market. Two companies control 72% of the beer market. In over 75% of US industries, market concentration has increased significantly since 2000. When there are only 3-4 sellers, the incentive to compete on price disappears — replaced by tacit coordination to maintain high margins.

Healthcare is the most extreme example. Prices in the US healthcare system are 2-3 times higher than in any other wealthy country — not because of quality differences, but because of market power. Hospital systems have consolidated dramatically: 65% of metropolitan areas now have highly concentrated hospital markets. When a hospital system is the only option in a region, it can charge whatever it wants. Insurance companies, which are supposed to negotiate lower prices, have also consolidated — the top 4 insurers control over 50% of the market. Two monopolists negotiating with each other is not a functioning market.

The 'free market' framing assumes markets that look like textbook models: many buyers, many sellers, perfect information, and easy entry. Real markets look nothing like this. They have barriers to entry (patents, licensing, capital requirements), information asymmetries (healthcare pricing is deliberately opaque), switching costs (try changing your health insurance or internet provider), and regulatory capture (industries write the rules that govern them). In these real-world conditions, the market doesn't self-correct — it concentrates, extracts, and resists reform.

Key Data Point
75%+US industries with increasing market concentration since 2000

4 companies control 85% of beef, 66% of airlines, 80% of mobile phones

Learn more: How concentration kills competition
4
The Claim

"Government programs make things more expensive."

5
The Claim

"Young people can't afford things because they waste money on luxuries."

6
The Claim

"Wages aren't stagnant — people just spend more than they used to."

7
The Claim

"Corporations aren't greedy — they're just competitive."

8
The Claim

"Housing is affordable if you're willing to move."

9
The Claim

"Healthcare costs are high because of medical innovation."

10
The Claim

"The middle class isn't shrinking — the definition has just changed."

10
Myths Examined
64%
Productivity vs. ~1% Wages
7.7x
Home Price / Income
50%
Middle Class (was 61%)

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most searched affordability questions.

Want the full picture on affordability?

Read the complete deep-dive guide, explore the full policy, or compare our approach to other parties.

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic Policy Institute, Pew Research Center, Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), National Association of Realtors, Congressional Budget Office, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Census Bureau, OECD Cost of Living data, Roosevelt Institute.

All claims on this page are sourced from peer-reviewed research, government data, or independent policy analysis. See the full affordability guide for complete citations.