The US is one of only four countries since 1994 to roll back abortion rights. 62.7 million women now live under state bans.
We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page breaks down our reproductive rights plan — but there's much more to explore.
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade after 49 years, eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion. Within months, the consequences became clear: 62.7 million women of reproductive age now live in states that have banned or severely restricted abortion access.
Trigger laws — abortion bans that had been pre-enacted and designed to take effect the moment Roe was overturned — activated in 13 states within weeks of the Dobbs decision. Additional states enacted new bans through legislative action. As of 2024, 14 states have enacted near-total abortion bans, and an additional 7 have implemented bans at 6-15 weeks of gestation — before most women even know they are pregnant. Only 21 states and DC have laws explicitly protecting abortion access.
The impact on access has been devastating. Women traveling across state lines for abortion care has increased by over 100% since Dobbs. Clinics in states bordering ban states are overwhelmed — wait times in Illinois, New Mexico, and Kansas have tripled. Women in Texas, the largest state with a near-total ban, must travel an average of 248 miles to reach a legal abortion provider, compared to 17 miles before the ban. For low-income women — who disproportionately are women of color — the cost of travel, lodging, childcare, and lost wages makes legal abortion financially impossible.
Emergency medical care has been compromised. Doctors in ban states report delaying treatment for ectopic pregnancies, incomplete miscarriages, and other pregnancy emergencies because they fear prosecution under vaguely written ban laws. ProPublica and other investigative outlets have documented cases where women died or suffered permanent injury because physicians waited until patients were "sick enough" to qualify for the life-threatening exception. The Texas Medical Association has reported that physicians are leaving the state rather than practice under these conditions.
The Dobbs decision did not merely return the issue to the states. It created a two-tier system in which a woman's access to basic healthcare depends entirely on her zip code and her bank account. Wealthy women travel. Poor women carry pregnancies to term against their will. This is not a hypothetical — it is the documented reality of post-Dobbs America. For the full impact analysis, see the reproductive rights issue page.
The global trend over the past 30 years has been toward expanding reproductive rights. Since 1994, over 60 countries have liberalized their abortion laws. Only four have rolled them back: the United States, Poland, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. The US is the only wealthy democracy on that list.
| Country | Legal Status | Gestational Limit | Public Funding | Maternal Mortality/100K | Contraception Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Varies by state | Banned in 14 states | Banned (Hyde Amdt.) | 32.9 | Varies; cost barriers |
| Canada | Legal, no restrictions | None | Publicly funded | 8.4 | Publicly funded |
| United Kingdom | Legal | 24 weeks | NHS-funded (free) | 6.9 | Free via NHS |
| France | Legal (constitutional) | 14 weeks | Publicly funded | 5.5 | Free under 26 |
| Germany | Legal | 12 weeks (counseling) | Covered for low-income | 3.2 | Free under 22 |
| Sweden | Legal | 18 weeks | Publicly funded | 2.6 | Free under 21 |
The data reveals a clear pattern. Countries that protect reproductive rights, fund abortion and contraception publicly, and invest in maternal healthcare have dramatically lower maternal mortality rates and better health outcomes for women and children. The United States — which restricts abortion access, bans public funding, and has the highest maternal mortality in the developed world — is the cautionary example, not the model.
Canada is particularly instructive. Since decriminalizing abortion entirely in 1988 (with no gestational limit), Canada has seen no increase in late-term abortions, no decline in birth rates, and a maternal mortality rate roughly one-quarter of America's. The absence of a legal gestational limit has not led to the consequences that opponents predicted — because medical ethics, not criminal law, govern medical decisions.
Sources: WHO, Guttmacher Institute, OECD, national health agencies. See the full reproductive rights issue page for complete sourcing.
The Common Good plan establishes comprehensive federal protections for reproductive rights — covering abortion, contraception, IVF, maternal health, and sex education — through specific legislative provisions modeled on the best-performing healthcare systems in the world.
Every provision is grounded in medical evidence, constitutional analysis, and the proven experience of peer democracies. This is not a statement of values. It is a legislative framework with implementation details, cost projections, and measurable outcomes.
For the complete plan with legislative detail, legal analysis, medical evidence, and cost projections, see the full reproductive rights issue page.
The United States had a maternal mortality rate of 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2021 (a pandemic-year peak; the 2023 rate declined to 16.7) — the highest in the developed world. In Sweden, the rate is 2.6. In Germany, 3.2. In the UK, 6.9. American women are dying in childbirth at rates that would be scandalous in any peer nation — and the disparity is getting worse, not better.
Racial disparities are the most devastating dimension of US maternal mortality. Black women are 2.6 times more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than white women — and this disparity persists regardless of income, education, or insurance status. A Black woman with a college degree is more likely to die in childbirth than a white woman without a high school diploma. The causes include systemic racism in healthcare delivery, provider bias, chronic stress from racial discrimination (which produces measurable physiological effects), and geographic access barriers in communities of color.
Lack of universal coverage means millions of women enter pregnancy without adequate prenatal care. Women who are uninsured or underinsured skip prenatal visits, delay reporting complications, and present to emergency rooms in crisis rather than receiving ongoing monitoring. The US is the only wealthy country where a significant portion of pregnant women lack health insurance. Under the Common Good universal healthcare plan, every pregnant woman would have comprehensive coverage from conception through one year postpartum.
Inadequate postpartum care is the third driver. The standard US model provides a single postpartum visit at six weeks after delivery — and then effectively abandons the patient. Over one-third of pregnancy- related deaths occur between one week and one year after delivery, during a period when most women have minimal medical oversight. Every other wealthy country provides home visits, extended monitoring, and postpartum mental health screening. The US does not. The current 60-day Medicaid postpartum coverage window is dangerously inadequate.
Midwifery shortages compound all of these problems. Countries with strong midwifery systems — where midwives manage the majority of low-risk pregnancies — have dramatically lower maternal mortality rates. The UK, the Netherlands, and Sweden all rely on midwife-led care as the standard model. The US has approximately 15,000 certified nurse-midwives for a population of 330 million. The Common Good plan commits to tripling that number within a decade, with federal funding for midwifery education and expanded scope-of-practice laws.
The campaign to restrict reproductive rights relies on misinformation that has been debunked by medical research, international evidence, and public health data. Here are the four most persistent myths — and what the evidence actually shows.
Myth: "Late-term abortions are common and elective."
Reality: Approximately 93% of abortions occur in the first trimester (before 13 weeks). Only about 1% occur after 21 weeks, and these are almost exclusively the result of severe fetal anomalies — conditions incompatible with life, such as anencephaly — or serious threats to the mother's health. No one carries a pregnancy for five or six months and then decides to end it on a whim. Late-term abortions are tragic medical decisions, not casual choices. They are also the abortions most likely to be delayed by the very access barriers that abortion opponents create — waiting periods, travel requirements, and clinic closures push procedures later into pregnancy.
Myth: "Abortion bans reduce the number of abortions."
Reality: They do not. The Lancet's global analysis found that abortion rates are roughly equal in countries where abortion is legal (36 per 1,000 women) and countries where it is banned (37 per 1,000 women). What changes is not the number — it is the safety. In countries with legal abortion, nearly all procedures are safe. In countries with bans, approximately 45% of abortions are unsafe, contributing to an estimated 39,000 preventable deaths per year worldwide. What actually reduces abortion rates is comprehensive contraception access and sex education — the very policies that many abortion opponents also oppose. The Netherlands, which has liberal abortion laws, universal contraception, and comprehensive sex education, has one of the lowest abortion rates in the world.
Myth: "This is just about abortion."
Reality: The legal frameworks being used to ban abortion also threaten contraception, IVF, and miscarriage management. Fetal personhood laws — which define embryos as legal persons from the moment of fertilization — could criminalize IVF (which routinely creates and discards embryos), certain forms of contraception (like IUDs and Plan B, which opponents claim prevent implantation), and medical treatment of miscarriages (which can be clinically indistinguishable from induced abortion). The Alabama Supreme Court's 2024 embryo ruling was not an aberration — it was the logical endpoint of the personhood framework. Reproductive rights encompass far more than abortion, and the threats to them are far broader than most people realize.
Myth: "Most Americans support abortion bans."
Reality: They do not. Polling consistently shows that 60-70% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. In every state where abortion has appeared on the ballot since Dobbs — including deep-red states like Kansas, Kentucky, Ohio, and Montana — voters have rejected abortion bans or affirmed abortion rights. Kansas voters rejected an anti-abortion amendment by an 18-point margin. Ohio voters enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution by a 13-point margin. Abortion bans are unpopular with the American public. They persist because of gerrymandered state legislatures and a Supreme Court that overruled 49 years of precedent against the will of the majority. See the voting rights page for how gerrymandering enables minority rule.
Click any question to expand the answer.
Have a question not answered here? Read the full reproductive rights issue page or visit our site-wide FAQ.
Check back soon for policy analysis of reproductive rights news.
62.7 million women live under state abortion bans. The US has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. Read the full plan and see exactly how we protect reproductive rights — with sources, medical evidence, and implementation details.