3,500 newspapers closed since 2005. 213 counties have no local news. The US dropped from 32nd to 57th in press freedom.
We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page breaks down our media and press freedom plan — but there's much more to explore.
Since 2005, more than 3,500 American newspapers have closed. The industry employs roughly 60% fewer journalists than it did two decades ago. This is not a natural market correction. It is the result of three specific, identifiable forces that could be addressed through policy — if anyone in power cared enough to act.
The first force is the digital advertising shift. Google and Facebook now capture more than 80% of all digital advertising revenue. They did not build this dominance by producing journalism — they built it by distributing other people's journalism and harvesting the engagement it generates. When a user shares a news article on Facebook or finds it through Google Search, the platform earns advertising revenue while the newspaper that investigated, reported, and published the story receives little or nothing. Classified advertising — which once generated 30-40% of newspaper revenue — migrated almost entirely to Craigslist and online marketplaces. The economic foundation of local news was destroyed in less than a decade.
The second force is private equity and hedge fund ownership. As newspapers became financially vulnerable, they became acquisition targets for firms like Alden Global Capital, which has been called "the destroyer of newspapers" by the Columbia Journalism Review. The playbook is consistent: acquire a newspaper chain at a discount, slash the newsroom by 50-70%, cut costs to the bone, extract short-term profits, and let the hollowed-out shell collapse. Alden alone controls more than 200 newspapers. The journalists who remain are stretched so thin that meaningful investigative work becomes impossible. The newspaper continues to exist in name, but the journalism is gone.
The third force is the rising cost of investigative journalism in an era of declining willingness to pay. A single investigative series can cost a newsroom hundreds of thousands of dollars in reporter time, legal review, and FOIA requests — and it may generate no more page views than a listicle. In an advertising-driven model, the economics of accountability journalism simply don't work. The stories that matter most to democracy are the stories that are hardest to fund.
The result is 213 counties with no local news at all, and over 1,800 counties with only one remaining outlet. For related policy on the tech platforms driving this crisis, see the internet and privacy policy page.
When local news dies, democracy deteriorates in measurable, documented ways. Corruption increases. Voter turnout drops. Municipal borrowing costs rise. Communities lose the only institution that holds local power accountable.
The research is unambiguous. A 2020 study found that federal corruption convictions increase by approximately 38% in areas that lose local news coverage. When no reporter is sitting in the city council meeting, no reporter is reviewing the municipal budget, no reporter is filing FOIA requests, and no reporter is talking to whistleblowers — officials behave worse. This is not speculation. It is measured, peer-reviewed, and replicated across multiple studies.
Municipal borrowing costs rise when local newspapers close. A 2018 study in the Journal of Financial Economics found that bond yields increase by 5-11 basis points after a newspaper closure — translating to millions of dollars in additional costs to taxpayers. Investors know that reduced oversight increases the risk of government mismanagement and financial irregularity. The market literally prices in the absence of journalism.
Voter turnout drops when communities lose local news. Studies have found that newspaper closures reduce turnout in local elections by as much as 8 percentage points. When citizens don't know who their candidates are, what they stand for, or what the issues at stake in a local election mean for their lives, they stay home. The decline in local news has contributed to the nationalization of American politics — where local elections become proxies for national partisan identity rather than referendums on local governance.
Police misconduct goes unreported. Community health outcomes worsen as local health reporting disappears. School board decisions go unscrutinized. Zoning corruption increases. Environmental violations go undetected. Local news is not a luxury. It is infrastructure — as essential to the functioning of democracy as courts, elections, and legislatures. For related policy on voter participation and government accountability, see those issue pages.
The Common Good plan treats local journalism as democratic infrastructure — essential to self-governance and worth public investment, with structural safeguards to prevent government influence over editorial content.
The plan combines direct support for local newsrooms with structural reforms that address the market failures driving the crisis. Each provision has a specific purpose, and none gives the government any editorial authority over news content.
For the complete plan with legislative detail, cost projections, and sourcing, see the full media and press freedom issue page.
The United States has dropped from 32nd to 57th in the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index. Countries that invest in public interest journalism and enforce media ownership rules consistently outperform the US on every press freedom measure.
| Country | Press Freedom Rank | Public Media Funding | Journalist Protections | Ownership Rules | Local News Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 57th | $3.16/capita (CPB) | No federal shield law | Deregulated since 1996 | 3,500 papers closed |
| Norway | 1st | $134/capita | Strong source protection | Ownership limits enforced | Robust, publicly supported |
| Denmark | 2nd | $112/capita | Constitutional protections | Transparency requirements | Strong, subsidized |
| Sweden | 3rd | $109/capita | Press freedom since 1766 | Diversity requirements | Subsidized local press |
| United Kingdom | 23rd | $97/capita (BBC) | Qualified privilege | Ofcom plurality rules | BBC local + declining print |
| France | 24th | $74/capita | Source protection law | Anti-concentration rules | Subsidized, under pressure |
The pattern is clear: countries that invest in public interest journalism have stronger press freedom, more local news coverage, and healthier democracies. The United States spends approximately $3.16 per capita on public media through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Norway spends $134. Denmark spends $112. The US outspends every country on Earth on its military but invests almost nothing in the information infrastructure that democracy requires to function.
Critically, every country that ranks above the US in press freedom provides public funding for journalism — and every one of them maintains editorial independence from government through structural safeguards. Public funding and press independence are not opposites. They are complements. For a side-by-side comparison of party positions, see the Compare Parties page.
The link between the loss of local news and the rise of government corruption is one of the most robust findings in modern political science. When no one is watching, officials behave worse. The data makes this unmistakably clear.
A landmark study published in the Journal of Financial Economics found that when a local newspaper closes, municipal bond yields increase by 5-11 basis points. This is not a small effect. Across all affected municipalities, it translates to billions of dollars in additional borrowing costs borne by taxpayers. Bond markets are not sentimental — they price in the increased risk of financial mismanagement that comes with reduced oversight. When the watchdog disappears, the market adjusts for the increased probability of fraud.
Research on corruption prosecution rates tells the same story. Areas that lose local news coverage see approximately 38% more federal corruption convictions — not because more corruption is being caught, but because more corruption is occurring. Local reporters are often the first to identify suspicious spending, conflicts of interest, and violations of open-meetings laws. Without them, corruption goes undetected until it becomes too large to ignore.
Voter engagement declines measurably in news deserts. When citizens cannot access information about local candidates, ballot measures, and governance decisions, they disengage. Studies have documented drops of up to 8 percentage points in local election turnout after newspaper closures. This creates a downward spiral: lower turnout means less representative government, which means worse governance, which further erodes trust, which further reduces turnout.
Community health outcomes also suffer. Local health reporting informs communities about disease outbreaks, water quality issues, hospital closures, and public health policy. When local news disappears, communities lose an early warning system for health threats. Research has linked the decline of local news to worse COVID-19 outcomes in affected communities — areas without local news had lower vaccination rates and higher infection rates during the pandemic. See the healthcare policy page for related analysis.
Public discourse about the media crisis is dominated by misconceptions that distract from the structural problems destroying local journalism. Here are the four most persistent myths — and what the evidence actually shows.
Myth: "The internet replaced newspapers."
Reality: The internet did not replace the journalism that newspapers produced — it replaced the advertising revenue that funded it. There is no digital equivalent of a local newspaper's city hall reporter, court reporter, school board reporter, and investigative team. National news websites and social media feeds do not cover your city council meeting, your school budget, or your local police department. The content that disappeared when newspapers closed was not replicated online. It simply vanished — and with it, the accountability that local journalism provided.
Myth: "Media bias is the real problem."
Reality: Bias in national cable news is real, but it is a distraction from the far more damaging crisis: the disappearance of local news entirely. A biased local newspaper is still infinitely more valuable than no local newspaper at all. When people say "the media is biased," they are almost always talking about national cable news opinion shows — not the local reporter covering the water board meeting or the investigative journalist exposing municipal corruption. The bias debate serves the interests of those who benefit from reduced oversight by delegitimizing all journalism.
Myth: "The free market will solve it."
Reality: The free market created this crisis. Monopoly platforms extracted the advertising revenue, private equity extracted the remaining value, and market forces provided no mechanism to fund the public good of accountability journalism. Local news is a textbook market failure: it provides enormous social value (reduced corruption, informed citizens, community cohesion) but generates insufficient private revenue to sustain itself. Every democracy that has solved this problem has done so through some form of public investment — just as every democracy funds public schools, public roads, and public courts rather than leaving them entirely to market forces.
Myth: "Social media is just as good as journalism."
Reality: Social media is a distribution platform, not a journalism platform. It does not employ reporters. It does not conduct investigations. It does not file FOIA requests. It does not sit through city council meetings. What social media does is amplify content — and the content it amplifies most effectively is the content that generates the strongest emotional reaction, regardless of whether it is true. A Facebook post claiming your mayor is corrupt gets more engagement than a newspaper article proving it with documents. Without professional journalism to verify claims, social media becomes a vector for misinformation, not a substitute for accountability. See the AI and technology page for more on platform accountability.
Click any question to expand the answer.
Have a question not answered here? Read the full media and press freedom issue page or visit our site-wide FAQ.
Check back soon for policy analysis of press freedom news.
3,500 newspapers gone. 213 counties with no local news. Corruption rising, voter turnout falling. Read the full plan to rebuild the journalism infrastructure democracy requires.