The US produces more food than it consumes — yet 47.9 million Americans live in food-insecure households. This is a policy choice. We grow enough to feed everyone. We just choose not to.
We're a policy platform with 50 researched positions on every major issue. This page breaks down our food and agriculture plan — but there's much more to explore.
The United States produces more food than any country except China and India. American farms generate enough to feed 400 million people. Yet 47.9 million Americans — including 13 million children — live in households that don't have reliable access to enough food. This is not a production problem. It is a distribution problem, an access problem, and a political choice.
Hunger in America is driven by four intersecting failures. First, food deserts: 23.5 million Americans live in areas with no nearby grocery store, forcing them to rely on convenience stores and fast food for their nutrition. Second, inadequate wages: a full-time worker at the federal minimum wage cannot afford a nutritionally adequate diet in any county in America. Third, SNAP inadequacy: the average SNAP benefit of $6 per person per day does not cover the actual cost of a healthy diet in most markets. Fourth, school lunch gaps: during the pandemic, universal free school meals dramatically reduced child hunger — then Congress let them expire, and child food insecurity spiked again.
The geography of hunger is not random. Rural communities face collapsing local grocery infrastructure as chains consolidate. Urban communities face food deserts that track almost perfectly along racial and economic lines. Native American reservations have some of the highest food insecurity rates in the country. And everywhere, the same pattern holds: Americans are hungry not because food doesn't exist, but because the systems that connect food to people are broken.
Meanwhile, 30-40% of all food produced in America is wasted — approximately 133 billion pounds per year, valued at $408 billion. We throw away enough food to feed every hungry American multiple times over. For a full analysis of hunger and food access, see the food and agriculture issue page.
American agriculture is extraordinarily productive — and structurally broken. Consolidation has concentrated power in a handful of corporations. Farmers are squeezed between rising costs and stagnant prices. Farmworkers are among the most exploited laborers in the country. And the environmental costs are staggering.
Corporate consolidation has fundamentally distorted American agriculture. Four companies control 85% of beef processing. Four companies control 70% of pork processing. Three companies dominate the seed and pesticide market. This concentration gives a handful of corporations pricing power over both the farmers who sell to them and the consumers who buy from them — squeezing profits at both ends while the middlemen extract billions.
Farmers are being crushed. Input costs — seeds, fertilizer, equipment, fuel — have risen dramatically, while crop prices have stagnated or declined in real terms. The farm subsidy system, which was designed to help small family farms survive, now disproportionately benefits the largest operations: the top 10% of farms receive over 70% of all federal subsidies. Small and mid-sized farms are disappearing at an accelerating rate, and farm debt has reached record levels.
Farmworker exploitation is endemic. Approximately 44% of farmworkers earn below the poverty line. Most lack overtime protections, collective bargaining rights, and adequate safety standards. Heat-related illness, pesticide exposure, and workplace injury rates are among the highest of any industry. Farmworkers are explicitly excluded from key provisions of the National Labor Relations Act — a legacy of Jim Crow-era compromises designed to exclude Black and immigrant workers from labor protections.
Environmental degradation rounds out the crisis. Industrial agriculture is the largest source of water pollution in the United States, the largest driver of topsoil loss, and a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The current subsidy system rewards volume over sustainability, incentivizing practices that deplete soil, contaminate waterways, and accelerate climate change.
The Common Good plan addresses food and agriculture as a complete system — from farm to table — ensuring that farmers earn fair prices, workers are protected, consumers have access to affordable nutrition, and the land is sustained for future generations.
The plan is built on eight core provisions:
For the complete plan with legislative detail, cost projections, and sourcing, see the full food and agriculture issue page.
The United States is the world's largest food producer — and one of the only wealthy democracies where tens of millions of people go hungry. Other countries have made different policy choices, with dramatically different results.
| Country | Hunger Rate | School Meals | Farm Subsidies | Food Waste Policy | Organic % | Farmworker Protections |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 12.8% | Means-tested | Volume-based | Voluntary goals | 6% | Weak |
| France | 5.5% | Universal | CAP (environment-tied) | Mandatory donation law | 10% | Strong |
| Japan | 3.5% | Universal | Rice price support | Recycling mandates | 1% | Moderate |
| Brazil | 4.1% | Universal | Family farm priority | Zero Hunger program | 3% | Moderate |
| India | 16.6% | Universal (midday meals) | Price supports | Emerging policy | 3% | Weak |
| Denmark | 2.5% | Universal | CAP (environment-tied) | 50% reduction target | 12% | Strong |
France has made it illegal for supermarkets to throw away unsold food — they must donate it. Brazil's "Zero Hunger" program, launched in 2003, lifted 28 million people out of food insecurity within a decade. Japan and Denmark have universal school meal programs that feed every child regardless of income. The United States is an outlier — not because we lack the resources, but because we lack the political will.
Sources: USDA Economic Research Service, FAO, OECD, European Commission. See the full issue page for detailed sourcing.
23.5 million Americans live in food deserts — areas where affordable, nutritious food is not available within a reasonable distance. Food deserts are not accidents of geography. They are the predictable result of disinvestment, racial segregation, and corporate decisions about where profits can be maximized.
Food deserts map almost perfectly onto race and poverty. Black and Latino neighborhoods are half as likely to have a supermarket as white neighborhoods at the same income level. Rural communities have lost grocery stores at an accelerating rate as chains consolidate into larger, fewer locations. Native American reservations face some of the most severe food access challenges in the country, with some communities located over 100 miles from the nearest full-service grocery store.
The health consequences are devastating. Residents of food deserts have significantly higher rates of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and other diet-related chronic conditions. When the only food available within walking distance comes from gas stations and dollar stores, healthy eating becomes a luxury that many families simply cannot access — regardless of their knowledge or desire to eat well.
What works: The evidence points to a combination of approaches. Federal incentives like the Healthy Food Financing Initiative have successfully attracted grocery stores to underserved areas. Community gardens and urban farms increase fresh food access while building community. Mobile markets and farmers' markets that accept SNAP and WIC benefits can reach communities that fixed-location stores cannot. And expanding SNAP benefits ensures that even when food is available, families can afford it.
For the full food desert analysis and intervention plan, see the food and agriculture issue page and the housing and community development page.
Hunger in the wealthiest country on Earth persists in part because persistent myths prevent the political will to solve it. Here are the four most damaging myths — and what the data actually shows.
Myth: "People are hungry because they're lazy."
Reality: 73% of SNAP households include at least one working adult. The problem is not a lack of work — it's a lack of wages. A full-time worker at the federal minimum wage earns $15,080 per year, which is below the poverty line for a family of two. Food insecurity is concentrated among working families whose earnings cannot keep pace with the cost of food, housing, and healthcare. The "lazy poor" narrative is contradicted by the data: hunger in America is overwhelmingly a problem of working poverty, not unemployment. See the labor and workers' rights page for wage analysis.
Myth: "We produce enough food, so hunger isn't a policy issue."
Reality: Producing enough food and ensuring people can access it are entirely different problems. The US produces 30% more food than it consumes and simultaneously wastes 30-40% of its food supply — while 47.9 million Americans go hungry. Production abundance without equitable distribution is meaningless. Every country that has significantly reduced hunger has done so through policy intervention: school meal programs, food assistance, distribution infrastructure, and targeted investment in underserved communities. Hunger is always a policy problem.
Myth: "Food stamps are too generous."
Reality: The average SNAP benefit is approximately $6 per person per day — roughly $2 per meal. Try feeding yourself three nutritious meals for $6. SNAP benefits have consistently failed to keep pace with actual food costs, and multiple studies have shown that benefits run out before the end of the month for most recipients. The SNAP fraud rate is below 1% — lower than fraud rates in most private-sector programs and dramatically lower than tax evasion by wealthy individuals, which costs the Treasury an estimated $600 billion per year.
Myth: "Small farms can't feed America."
Reality: Small and mid-sized farms produce a significant share of American agriculture — particularly in fruits, vegetables, and specialty crops. The issue is not that small farms can't produce enough food. It's that the economic system — from subsidies to market access to processing infrastructure — is rigged in favor of the largest operations. Diversified small farms actually produce more food per acre than industrial monocultures when all crops are counted. The Common Good plan invests in local food systems, regional processing facilities, and subsidy reform that gives small farms a fair shot. For more, see the full food and agriculture plan.
Click any question to expand the answer.
Have a question not answered here? Read the full food and agriculture issue page or visit our site-wide FAQ.
Check back soon for policy analysis of food and agriculture news.
We produce more than enough food. We waste 30-40% of it. And 47.9 million Americans still can't reliably feed their families. This is a policy choice — and we can make a different one. Read the full plan.