LGBTQ+ Rights — Equal Citizens, Equal Protection
The US is the only major Western democracy without comprehensive federal LGBTQ+ non-discrimination protections.
The two-minute version.
A person can be protected from discrimination at work on Monday and legally evicted from their home on Tuesday. Bostock covers employment only — nothing else.
Pass the Equality Act. Codify marriage equality. Ban conversion therapy. Restore trans military service. Protect gender-affirming care. Full legal equality, nothing less.
LGBTQ+ Americans get full legal equality. Trans youth get access to evidence-based care. Same-sex couples can marry anywhere. The military gets its best personnel back.
Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) covers employment only. There is no federal law protecting LGBTQ+ Americans from discrimination in housing, public accommodations, education, credit, or jury service. Two-thirds of LGBTQ+ Americans report experiencing discrimination. Thirty-one states lack explicit statewide protections. A person can be legally protected at work on Monday and legally evicted from their home on Tuesday.
In 2025, 111 anti-LGBTQ+ laws were enacted — more than the total number of anti-miscegenation statutes enacted across all 41 states over 276 years. Twenty-seven states ban youth gender-affirming care, affecting 362,900 transgender youth. Twenty-one states have bathroom bans. The Respect for Marriage Act (RFMA) requires recognition of existing same-sex marriages but does not require states to issue new ones — Obergefell itself remains vulnerable to repeal.
Executive Order 14183 (January 2025) banned transgender military service. The US is now the only major NATO ally with such a ban. The DADT-era review is incomplete: 114,000 service members were discharged under Don't Ask, Don't Tell; only 1,375 have had benefits reinstated to date. Meanwhile, 39% of LGBTQ+ youth seriously considered suicide in 2024 (46% among trans/nonbinary youth), and hate crimes against LGBTQ+ people rose 8.6% in 2023.
The legislative assault escalated strategically. Sports bans were deployed in 2020–2021 as a wedge to normalize targeting trans people, then multiplied across healthcare bans, bathroom bans, education restrictions, legal recognition rollbacks, drag performance bans, book bans, and forced-outing laws. The model legislation was coordinated through the Heritage Foundation and Alliance Defending Freedom.
How the US compares.
What Americans face vs. what peer nations achieve.
| Measure | US | Peer Nation |
|---|---|---|
| Federal non-discrimination protections | Employment only | Comprehensive(39 countries + EU) |
| Transgender military service | Banned | Fully included(🇨🇦 Canada · 🇩🇰 Denmark · 🇮🇱 Israel · NATO) |
| Youth gender-affirming care | 27 states ban | Protected(🇩🇪 Germany · 🇮🇪 Ireland) |
| Same-sex marriage status | Obergefell vulnerable | Codified(39 countries constitutional/statutory) |
"Twelve pillars built on one principle: full legal equality, nothing more and nothing less. The attack has been waged on all of these fronts simultaneously — discrimination law, constitutional fragility, medical care, military service, education, legal recognition, and enforcement."
— The Common Good Party — LGBTQ+ Rights Policy
What the CGP plan actually does
For LGBTQ+ youth, the impact is life-or-death. Use of a transgender youth's chosen name by just one person in one context reduces suicidal behavior by 56%. Family acceptance reduces suicide risk by two-thirds. Hormone therapy produces a 43.6% reduction in suicidality. Currently 39% of LGBTQ+ youth seriously considered suicide in 2024; under the CGP plan, gender-affirming care is federally protected, chosen names and pronouns become a federal expectation in schools, and anti-bullying protections cover sexual orientation and gender identity.
For transgender adults and the military, Executive Order 14183 is reversed on day one. All service members discharged under the 2025 ban are reinstated with full back pay. The CGP plan also completes a comprehensive DADT-era discharge review covering 114,000 veterans — only 1,375 of whom have had benefits reinstated to date. Every study shows military inclusion has zero impact on operational effectiveness; Canada, Denmark, Israel, and every major NATO ally prove this.
For same-sex couples, marriage equality is affirmatively codified — not just recognized. Obergefell v. Hodges is vulnerable; the Respect for Marriage Act only requires recognition of existing marriages. If Obergefell falls, states could refuse to marry same-sex couples while technically complying with RFMA. The CGP plan guarantees the right to marry regardless of sex or gender, with federal preemption. 69% of Americans support marriage equality.
For the economy, anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination costs up to 1% of GDP — approximately $255 billion annually. Each additional LGBTQ+ legal right is associated with $1,400 higher GDP per capita across countries. LGBTQ+ business owners contribute $1.7 trillion to the US economy annually. North Carolina's HB2 bathroom bill alone cost the state $3.76 billion. Equality is an economic policy as much as a civil rights policy.
What changes on day one
"Use of a transgender youth's chosen name — by one person, in one context — reduces suicidal behavior by 56%. Family acceptance reduces suicide risk by two-thirds. The intervention is not complicated. It is dignity."
— CGP LGBTQ+ Rights Paper — §Our Policy
See where every side actually stands.
Current federal law, the Democratic Party's 2024 platform, the Republican Party's 2024 platform, and our plan — side by side, sourced to the record.
Open the side-by-side comparisonThe homework other parties skip. We did it.
Sourced, cited, costed, and written to a standard that could walk into a legislative office tomorrow. 1,973 words across 0 pillars.
- ACLU — 2025 legislative attacks on LGBTQ+ rights
- Trevor Project — 2024 National Survey on LGBTQ+ Youth Mental Health
- DOJ/FBI — Hate crime statistics 2023
- Williams Institute (UCLA Law) — Economic cost of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination
- Pew Research — Same-sex marriage around the world
- Movement Advancement Project — State equality index
- Cornell University — What We Know about gender-affirming care